51³Ô¹Ï

This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to collect information about how you interact with our website and allow us to remember your browser. We use this information to improve and customize your browsing experience, for analytics and metrics about our visitors both on this website and other media, and for marketing purposes. By using this website, you accept and agree to be bound by UVic’s Terms of Use and Protection of Privacy Policy. If you do not agree to the above, you must not use this website.

Skip to main content

Stephen Behnke-Joyce

  • BA (Concordia University, 2020)
Notice of the Final Oral Examination for the Degree of Master of Public Administration

Topic

Localizing the Sustainable Development Goals in the Greater 51³Ô¹Ï Area: “It’s the Little Things that Countâ€

School of Public Administration

Date & location

  • Thursday, April 3, 2025
  • 11:30 A.M.
  • Virtual Defence

Examining Committee

Supervisory Committee

  • Dr. Walter Lepore, School of Public Administration, 51³Ô¹Ï (Supervisor)
  • Prof. Evert Lindquist, School of Public Administration, UVic (Member)

External Examiner

  • Dr. Crystal Tremblay, Department of Geography, UVic

Chair of Oral Examination

  • Dr. Purnima Govindarajulu, School of Environmental Studies, UVic

Abstract

This thesis explores the development and implementation of a Voluntary Local Review (VLR) to localize the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) within the Greater 51³Ô¹Ï Area (GVA). It examines key challenges and opportunities arising from the region’s multi-jurisdictional governance system and provides actionable recommendations for policymakers to advance SDG localization. Four research questions guide this study: 1) What strategies, policies, and best practices from cities that have successfully implemented VLRs can be drawn upon to inform SDG localization in the GVA? 2) How can these lessons be adapted to the specific context of the GVA to enhance SDG localization efforts? 3) How have cities with successful localization efforts integrated stakeholder engagement and collaboration by incorporating multiple municipalities within their city to align their SDGs to create strategies for implementing VLRs? 4) What are the challenges and barriers faced by cities during the process of implementing localized agendas and VLRs for SDG localization, and what mitigation strategies and solutions have been employed to overcome these challenges?

In order to answer these questions, the study focuses on: (1) analyzing successful VLR models to guide tailored recommendations for the GVA, (2) assessing how localized SDG targets can be developed in complex governance contexts, and (3) offering strategies to implement a territorial approach to the SDGs, contributing to the global agenda. Using a realist synthesis, taxonomic analysis, and key informant interviews, the research provides context-specific insights for the GVA's VLR.

Chapter 1 outlines the research problem, objectives, and the governance context of the GVA and the Capital Regional District (CRD). Chapter 2 reviews the literature on SDG localization, analyzing case studies of cities with VLRs to identify common challenges and best practices. It also presents an analytical framework illustrating the logical flow of the methodology, preliminary findings, and results.

Chapter 3 details the research design, including collective case studies, realist synthesis, and Spradley’s taxonomic analysis. The VLRs of 11 cities were initially examined, narrowing to four based on their relevance to the GVA. A typology of governance, measurement, and implementation models was developed to compare these cities’ practices with primary data from interviews, assessing the most suitable VLR model for the GVA.

Chapter 4 presents preliminary findings from secondary data analysis, which identified models of VLR development in multi-jurisdictional, medium-sized cities. Chapter 5 provides insights from interviews with GVA stakeholders, shedding light on governance, SDG measurement frameworks, and policy implementation. These findings informed the preferred VLR model for the GVA.

Chapter 6 addresses the research questions. For strategies, policies, and best practices (research question 1), the study recommends a hybrid governance model that integrates local leadership with ext